cased in stainless steel for protection),
they should never be dropped or struck.
Magnets are also susceptible to damage
from excessive heat. Follow the manufacturer’s instructions and include them
in initial and refresher training for personnel who are handling magnets.
Magnets can also lose strength over
time, either naturally—which is typically
a slow loss—or through damage, which
can be very fast. So, regular pull tests
should be conducted to check magnets’
attractive force against their original
strength. (Pull tests use a device with a
piece of metal of a specific size and a
meter that measures the amount of force
needed to pull the piece of metal loose
from the magnet.) These tests are probably only needed every couple of years to
monitor how fast your magnets are decaying. If a magnet has been subjected
to excessive heat (possibly from a fire) or
has been dropped or struck, it should be
pull-tested immediately.
By monitoring your magnets over
time, you can predict when they will
need to be replaced, and capital dollars
can be budgeted in advance.
“There is no doubt that product safety
devices…have helped make the food and beverage
industry safer.”
FMDs need the most care and maintenance of all of the devices discussed.
Calibration/validation/verification,
training and interference issues are all essential considerations.
Foreign Matter Detectors
(FMDs)
FMDs are devices that operate by creating an electromagnetic field and monitoring changes as product passes through
it. A disruption of the field will be detected. The FMD must be calibrated for
the specific product type, and can be designed to scan product either before or
after packaging. The FMD should be
connected to a reject device to prevent
any material that trips the FMD from
continuing downstream. Some FMDs
operate similar to sifters/strainers and
magnets early in a product stream to
allow for removal of foreign matter that
might damage equipment. Others are
placed directly before or after the product is packaged as a final quality check.
FMDs will not pick up all foreign objects, just those that disrupt the electromagnetic field. They have an advantage
over magnets in that they will identify
stainless steel. However, the size of the
stainless steel particles that FMD will detect is typically larger than that of ferrous metals since stainless steel disrupts
electromagnetic fields less.
Calibration/Validation/
Verification
Initial setup of the FMD is critical to
ensure that it will accurately detect foreign matter. The device must be carefully calibrated to the product by the
manufacturer’s technical representative.
Make sure to follow the manufacturer’s
requirements in terms of metal-free
zones and vibration elimination. An
alarm counter should be included in the
setup.
Once the calibration has been completed, a regular program of validation
must be implemented to ensure the device continues to function properly. Typically, a coupon containing a specific
size sphere of stainless, non-ferrous or
ferrous metal is run through the FMD
with the product. The device should detect the coupon and sound an alarm,
and the reject should capture the
coupon and associated product. If all of
these do not happen, then maintenance
will need to troubleshoot the issue. All
of the metal types must be run to validate the device’s ability to detect each
type. Stronger programs will periodically
validate each coupon three or more
times in a row as a more stringent challenge of the device.
The program often will also use more
frequent verification without product
running. This is especially common
when the device is positioned immediately before packaging, and using a
coupon in the product stream puts the
coupon in the package, resulting in having to open the package to retrieve the
coupon. A plastic wand containing either ferrous or non-ferrous metal on one
end and stainless steel on the other is inserted into the FMD aperture. The alarm
should sound, but without product running, the reject mechanism cannot be
checked.
A log for each FMD is needed to
record each alarm, including checks. The
findings of the alarm must also be
recorded, including any false alarms.
Any findings of foreign material should
(continued on page 47)
Examples of Interference
A plant was troubleshooting excessive false alarms. The cause was determined to be an extra-long FMD cable that was the standard length ordered by
the company. The extra cable length was coiled near the FMD, causing interference. The correction was to shorten the cable.
In another example, carts used to
transport weigher hoppers to a nearby
equipment washer were causing excessive vibration, leading to false alarms.
The plant adjusted procedures to stop
using these carts during production.
This change reduced the ability to use
the washer during flavor changeovers,
however. The plant is still searching for a
solution that will allow the washer to be
used during flavor changeovers without
causing excessive vibration.
The extra cable that was coiled caused
electrical interference with this FMD.